Oversimplified and in my own opinion: Contact discourse is basically the question of "is it okay to act on minor attraction or zoophilia? (and necrophilia)" Anti-contact paraphilia activism is about the difference between fantasy and reality and being able to separate the two. Pro-contact paraphilia activism is people trying to actually have sex with children/animals.
See the MAP wiki page on contact discourse for a much more nuanced look into the debate.
Want to avoid pro-c's? I have a page for that.
I'm generally aligned with what FLEUR or limi-c believes, I label my stance on this matter as "anti contact".
I am against large chronological age gaps involving those that are chronologically minors. I think there is a large imbalance in experience and power in society that comes with different ages.
I am against sexual contact between those inhabiting human bodies and animals who are not. Sexual contact between humans & therians, animal headmates, transspecies individuals, is okay. But besides that, animals generally do not understand consent and do not have the same rights as humans.
I only support necrophilic contact if an individual actually consented to their body being used for those purposes before they died.
My anti-contact stance relates to current society. It would be cool if there is a society in the future in which this kind of contact can be non-harmful, but I doubt that will happen ever 🤷
I think the (anti-contact) paraphile community should be less connected to pro-contact stuff.
If anyone wants to ask a question, then please do ask.